I enjoyed reading about the different models of evaluation.
Each of the models seems to have their own advantages. Kirkpatrick’s
theory of evaluation extends goal-based evaluation models and "translates
into four levels of evaluation...known as reaction, learning, behavior, and
results" (Eseryel, 2002, p. 2). Kirkpatrick's goal-based, four-level
model of evaluation of training has become outdated, but the 4 basic principles
still apply.
Each of these models can be used effectively to create
different teaching methods and design. I think it's clear that Kirkpatrick's
model is better utilized after a project is complete. I think it should be used
as a reflection for how to better prepare and create future models. The
advantage of using Kirkpatrick’s model after the data is collected would be to
create a better environment based on the models information the next time this
model is updated. Since I read several articles, in one I found that Kirkpatrick’s
model has now added a 5th level, The ROI or return on investment
level to help determine if the product accomplished the goals it was chosen to accomplish.
The disadvantage of Kirkpatrick’s model
is that it doesn't allow for adjustments. This is where the ACTIONS model is
more effective, especially in the process and product phases. From my own
experience using tech in the classroom can be effective but, sometimes not
enough training has been done for students to use certain technologies. It is
just assumed they will know what to do. These models help to determine where
more teaching might be needed. Both of the following articles have good
comparison information on various models
The Bates model is summarized using the acronym ACTIONS. Below is an overview of the main components of ACTIONS: Access: how accessible is a particular technology for learners? How flexible is it for a particular target group?
Costs: what is the cost structure of each technology? What is the unit cost per student?
Teaching and learning: what kinds of learning are needed? What instructional approaches will best meet these needs? What are the best technologies for supporting this teaching and learning?
Interactivity and user-friendliness: what kind of interaction does this technology enable? How easy is it to use?
Organizational issues: what are the organizational requirements, and the barriers to be removed, before this technology can be used successfully? What changes in organization need to be made?
Novelty: how new is this technology?
Speed: how quickly can courses be mounted with this technology? How quickly can materials be changed?
The
following diagram outlines the four main focus areas of the Bates model. The
left hand column under each header outlines the types of roles that are
involved in each phase, while the right hand side outlines the actions that
should be addressed in each phase.
|
Course Outline Developed
|
Selection of Media
|
||
|
Project Manager
Subject Matter Expert Instructional Designers |
Target Group Identified
Place in curriculum identified Content Agreed Teaching Approach Agreed |
Project Manager
Subject Matter Expert Instructional Designers Media Specialist |
Access
Costs Teaching Functions Interactions Organizational Issues Novelty Speed |
|
Development/Production of Materials
|
Course Delivery
|
||
|
Project Manager
Subject Matter Expert Instructional Designers Media Specialist Senior Tutor Operations Manager |
Copyright Clearence
Printing A/V Production Computer Based Materials Tutorial Arrangements |
Project Manager
Subject Matter Expert Instructional Designers Tutors Operations Manager Exams Officer |
Packaging
Mailing Tutoring Library Services Student Assessment Course Evaluation |
Source: Bates Model: Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education by A. Bates, 1995
No comments:
Post a Comment